Event-Driven Architecture Patterns for Modern Applications
A deep dive into event-driven architecture patterns including event sourcing, CQRS, and choreography vs orchestration.
Event-driven architectures have become essential for building responsive, scalable systems. Here are the patterns I rely on most in production.
Why Events?
Traditional request-response architectures create tight coupling between services. Events introduce temporal decoupling — services communicate by publishing and subscribing to events rather than calling each other directly.
The benefits are significant:
- Loose coupling between services
- Better scalability through independent scaling of producers and consumers
- Improved resilience since service failures don't cascade
- Natural audit trails through event logs
Core Patterns
Event Sourcing
Instead of storing the current state, store the sequence of events that led to that state. This provides:
- Complete audit history
- The ability to reconstruct state at any point in time
- Natural support for debugging and rollback
The trade-off is increased complexity in querying current state, which leads us to the next pattern.
CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation)
Separate your read and write models. Commands modify state by producing events, while queries read from optimized read models built from those events.
This is particularly powerful when:
- Read and write workloads have different scaling requirements
- You need multiple read representations of the same data
- Complex queries would slow down your write path
Choreography vs. Orchestration
Choreography lets each service react to events independently. It works well for simple workflows but can become difficult to reason about as complexity grows.
Orchestration uses a central coordinator to manage workflow steps. I prefer this for complex business processes where visibility and control are important.
Implementation Recommendations
For most teams starting with event-driven architecture, I recommend:
- Start with a reliable message broker (AWS SQS + SNS or EventBridge)
- Define clear event schemas and version them
- Implement idempotent consumers from the beginning
- Build dead-letter queues and monitoring from day one
Conclusion
Event-driven architecture is a powerful tool, but it's not a silver bullet. Use it where it adds clear value — decoupling services, enabling async processing, and building audit trails — and keep request-response for simple, synchronous interactions.